Ergun equation describes the flow through the packed bed, which estimates the pressure drop as a function of the velocity field u. Here, μ (Pa·s) and ρ (kg/m 3) are the viscosity and density of water, dp (m) is the spheres’ diameter, and εp the porosity. The permeability κ (m 2) of the pa
Contact online >>
This paper assesses the capability and sensitivity of COMSOL Multiphysics ® to evaluate phase-changing material suitability for Thermal Energy Storage. The simulated system is a packed
Energy storage is an essential component for hybrid power system using non-conventional energy resources. [4,5]. In this work, the 3-dimensional magnetic field distribution of this hybrid coil
vehicles and spacecraft, solar energy thermal storage and heating and sanitary hot water [4]. The three main types of thermal energy storage are sensible, thermochemical and latent [5]. Latent
They have received considerable attention in areas like solar thermal systems as they promise high energy storage density (both volumetric and gravimetric) and discharge temperatures.
How to simulate the energy storage density and energy storage efficiency of energy storage ceramic whose material is 0.76NaNbO3-0.24 ( Bi0.5Na0.5 ) TiO3. 0 Replies Last Post 24 set
Polar Night Energy, a startup in Finland, has developed technology for warming up buildings with solar-generated heat stored in sand. The team uses thermal modeling to optimize the design
1D model of a thermal energy storage (TES) system consisting of a packed bed of pellets. Three approaches for heat transfer in porous media are compared: A one-equation local thermal equilibrium (LTE) model; A two-equations local
TES systems using thermochemical materials are particularly attractive and provide a high energy storage density at a constant temperature. Chemical energy storage has unique advantages of
Magnetic Energy Storage Using COMSOL Multiphysics S. Roy*1, G. Konar1 1Jadavpur University Power Engineering Department, Kolkata, West Bengal, India density, the number of turns is
Thermal energy storage (TES) units are used to accumulate thermal energy from solar, geothermal, or waste heat sources. The simplest TES units are built from water tanks, where the solar energy is stored as sensible heat. These systems
This paper studies the influence of material thermal properties on the charging dynamics in a low temperature Thermal Energy Storage, which combines sensible and latent heat. The analysis is based on a small scale
To determine the right combination of products for your modeling needs, review the Specification Chart and make use of a free evaluation license. The COMSOL Sales and Support teams are available for answering any questions you may have regarding this. Try modeling a packed bed thermal energy storage system in COMSOL Multiphysics®.
Thermal energy storage (TES) units are used to accumulate thermal energy from solar, geothermal, or waste heat sources. The simplest TES units are built from water tanks, where the solar energy is stored as sensible heat. These systems are called sensible heat storage (SHS) units.
1D model of a thermal energy storage (TES) system consisting of a packed bed of pellets. Three approaches for heat transfer in porous media are compared: This model example illustrates applications of this type that would nominally be built using the following products: however, additional products may be required to completely define and model it.
The highest energy density from the mentioned has the storage by Zauner et al. 17. It is mostly because over 80% of the storage is occupied by PCM. Furthermore, a higher temperature difference plays some role. From the presented storages, it is the most complicated one from the manufacturing point of view and thus probably the most expensive.
The design by Zauner et al. 18 has even lower energy density, but it is fair to say that it is a hybrid latent-sensible storage and so energy density was not a priority. The highest energy density from the mentioned has the storage by Zauner et al. 17. It is mostly because over 80% of the storage is occupied by PCM.
Therefore, the overall heat energy density might be a good measure of the design effectiveness. The presented design has about 9% higher heat energy density then the design by Xu et al. 8 despite they used PCM with higher latent heat per unit volume (298 MJ m −3 vs 211 MJ m −3).
We are deeply committed to excellence in all our endeavors.
Since we maintain control over our products, our customers can be assured of nothing but the best quality at all times.